i. That this Honourable Court orders for the restoration of Applicant’s liberty by his release from prison where he is currently serving an unlawful sentence; ii. We pray that this Honourable Court applies the principle ...

Fidèle Mulindahabi (hereinafter referred to as “the Applicant”) is a national of the Republic of Rwanda, residing in Kigali, who complains that he has been victim of violations as regards his urban transport business. The ...

The Court reiterates that parties to an application should pursue their case with diligence. Where they fail or implicitly or expressly indicate their lack of interest to do so, Rule 65 of the Rules empowers the Court to ...

The Applicant filed the Application at this Court alleging that the proceedings in the domestic courts violated his rights as guaranteed in the Charter, namely, the right to a fair trial (Article 7), the right to dignity ...

In the instant case, the Court considers that it is appropriate, in the interest of justice and respect for the principle of adversarial proceedings, to adjourn the proceedings and order the reopening of the hearing in ...

The Court concludes that Applicant has failed to pursue his case within the meaning of Rule 65 (1) (b) of the Rules and thus, the Court decides to strike out the instant Application from its Cause List.

The Applicants allege the following: i. Violation of the rights to freedom of assembly under Article 11 of the Charter and Article 21 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereinafter referred to ...

From the proceedings of the present matter as earlier recounted, it merges that both parties have failed to file their pleadings within the time granted. Since the new pleadings involve new arguments and claims on which ...

The Court notes that the relevant Rule on striking out of Applications is Rule 65 (1) of the Rules, which provides that: 1. The Court may at any stage of the proceedings decide to strike out an Application from its cause ...