CASE SUMMARY APPLICATION 005/2013 ALEX THOMAS V THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA 1. The Applicant states that he is a convict serving a 30 year custodial sentence at Karanga Central Prison at Moshi, Kilimanjaro Region, ...

2. The Application is filed against the United Republic of Tanzania (hereinafter referred to as “the Respondent State”), which became party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter referred to as ...

The Applicant alleges the Decree-Law No. 11 of 2022 to establish a new Provisional Supreme Judicial Council in lieu of the elected Supreme Judiciary Council which was regulated by Law No. 34 of 2016 of 28 April 2016 violates ...

Conformément à la règle 69(3) du Règlement et en exécution du dispositif sus-énoncé, les Parties ont déposé leurs observations sur les réparations dans les délais impartis par la Cour.

In conformity with Rule 69(3) of the Rules, and in implementation of the operative part of its judgment on merits, the Parties filed their submissions on reparations within the times permitted by the Court.

Le 16 août 2019, le Requérant a déposé ses observations écrites, demandant à la Cour de lui accorder des réparations sur la base de ses conclusions dans l’arrêt sur le fond

On 16 August 2019, the Applicant filed his written submissions, praying the Court to award him reparations based on its findings in the judgment on the merits